![]() ![]() On the other hand, Microsoft Exchange is a proprietary email server solution designed to run on the Microsoft Windows Server operating system, and it is typically licensed as part of the Microsoft Office 365 suite, which is a subscription-based cloud service.įeatures and Functionality: Both CommuniGate Pro and Microsoft Exchange offer similar core features such as email messaging, calendaring, contacts, tasks, and shared resources. It offers flexible licensing options, including perpetual licenses and subscription-based licensing. Platform and Licensing: CommuniGate Pro is a cross-platform email server solution that can run on various operating systems, including Windows, macOS, Linux, and Unix. However, there are several key differences between the two: Also, the product supports the AMD64 platform.CommuniGate Pro and Microsoft Exchange are both email server solutions used for email communication and collaboration within organizations. ![]() In this review, the score for CommuniGate Pro 4.1.5 was originally incorrect. For an entry-level e-mail server, it's a no-brainer for SMBs (small to midsize businesses) looking to capitalize on the efficiency of groupware. It offers sturdy performance and easy integration without sacrificing features or functionality. In all, my experience with Stalker’s CommuniGate Pro was favorable. And, for tougher spam support, CommuniGate can integrate MailShell as well as anti-virus plug-ins from third-party vendors McAfee and Sophos. I easily set up the inbuilt services for spam protection that performed well in trapping and refusing e-mail through basic rules-based filtering. Modern-day necessities such as spam and anti-virus support are also available. The interface, though, suffers from the same lack of maturity as the WebUser interface and could benefit from improved navigation and streamlined usability. I found administering CommuniGate’s many features well-proffered through the Web-based interface, from which individual servers as well as entire cluster farms can be updated in unison with granular control. I was able to retrieve and edit my accounts with the same ease I'd have using the Outlook client natively, including groupware tasks and e-mail composition, with full spell checker and address book access. The WebUser interface scores well, though, on functionality. In general, the CommuniGate interface was clumsy and might throw a frustrating learning curve at transitioning employees. In addition, CommuniGate’s HTTP module serves browser-based accessibility to user accounts, supporting HTML and WML (Wireless Markup Language).But the interface is by no means comparable to the Microsoft Outlook Web Access (OWA) experience on Exchange. This discourages adoption by a good number of companies that rely on them for processes such as approval automation. On the downside, CommuniGate Pro did not support Outlook forms. End-users can manage discussions and groups without ever knowing they weren’t connected directly to an Exchange Server. I used most of the features that Exchange facilitates: publish/subscribe group scheduling and calendar functionality, respond to invitations, as well as access notes and contacts, set up tasks, and share folders. I installed the Windows service as well as the separate MAPI (Messaging API) connector, configured the usual cadre of IP parameters, and integrated my LDAP store without incident. Setting up the CommuniGate Pro server on Windows 2003 Server Enterprise Edition was an uncomplicated task.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |